GDN 2015

International Conference on Group Decision & Negotiation

SGH Warsaw School of Economics
Warsaw, Poland, June 22-26, 2015

SGH Warsaw School of Economics
Home | Scope | Submission | Dates & Fees | Keynotes | Committees | Programme | Sessions & Streams | Doctoral Consortium | Local Info | Patrons & Business partners |

Collective actions in the public realm
Monday, June 22, 2015, 13:30 - 17:30

More and more often we witness the emergence and growth of "open" communities with permeable boundaries and operationally effective. The effectiveness is achieved despite the fact that their members are not permanently involved in the communities' activities and their evolution. These communities often show effective self-organization and they show unanticipated collective intelligence, creativity and innovation.

Looking at some recent examples, especially in the urban context, we can observe an emergence of a specific subset of these communities in the public realm, being involved in collective actions - rather than following the plans and explicit will of the existing organisations. When these distinctive types of communities emerge in the public realm, the interplay between the "individual" and the "collective" becomes rich and productive, especially thanks to the "openness" of the involved actors, such as public and private parties (municipalities and individuals), to act outside - and free from - the existing organisational constraints.

Open communities in the public realm have been identified in many different contexts and are characterised by different types of social innovation initiatives, including living labs, communities of practices, communities of interests or communities of places. All these social innovation initiatives involve some sort of collective actions and follow very complex, as well as very interesting, decision making processes, which are hardly described by shared models of decision making theory.

Specifically, in open communities decisions:

  • are made in ephemeral governance environments, in which the experimental nature of the collective action introduces anomalies in the decision-making governance as well as in decision-making routines, and
  • lead to actions of unclear accountability, because they often involve public bodies without assuring the general and the collective value of the decisions themselves.

And yet, those environments are perceived to be highly democratic, innovative, and leading to successful social innovation, cohesion processes and decision governance. The key questions are: What is the secret of this success? How do open communities self-manage and implement decisions, which often break the rules of the mainstream decision-making in the public realm?

These questions may be addressed through answering a more specific questions, including:

  • What kinds of decision environments are conducive to open communities?
  • What decision-making processes do take place in such environments?
  • Are these environments truly effective to enable more democratic decisions?
  • What is the role of technologies in facilitating collective deliberation and decision making in these ephemeral contexts?

The papers presented at the Symposium aim to explore the above questions by attracting researchers and professionals working in such disciples as decision making theory, active governance, democracy, collective intelligence theory and technologies.

Symposium organizers:
     Grazia Concilio
     Anna De Liddo


For more information please contact: -> Streams & Sessions  


Valid HTML 4.01 Strict Valid CSS!